The Spiritual Master
…What
Srila Prabhupada arranged in ISKCON was a very safe and very clear path
for the new adherent to advance in Krishna consciousness and in the end
to reach the ultimate goal of going back to Godhead. The process of
sadhana bhakti with morning and evening classes, kirtana and Deity
worship coupled with training in preaching and daily Sankirtana activity
was the path to purification and the awakening of our dormant love for
Krishna. Simple, yet sublime!
As far as acceptance of a
spiritual master, in our day it was a foregone conclusion that the
initiated disciple was agreeing to worship Srila Prabhupada as good as
God and that the spiritual master was promising to deliver the disciple
from the cycle of birth and death.
Presently, people are still
being attracted to join this movement by coming into contact with Srila
Prabhupada's books, by association with good devotees who represent him
with transparency, and by developing a taste for chanting the Holy Name
and honoring Krishna prasadam. They agree to abide by the principles
established by Srila Prabhupada for all generations of ISKCON devotees —
past, present and future. They read and distribute his books, offer
obeisances to him when entering the temple, worship his murti, and focus
on cultivating a personal relationship with him. In other words,
someone who joins our movement today is doing so as a follower of Srila
Prabhupada and is accepting His Divine Grace as their eternal spiritual
master. It is he who is taking them back to the spiritual world. How
could someone who is not a resident of the spiritual world do so?
This is a continuation from our previous posts,
The Spiritual Master some time ago, and the further discussion in
The Spiritual Master (Part 2) And
The Spiritual Master (Part 3)
This is a fascinating account by Sriman Locanananda Prabhu revealing
his insights into the 'guru issue' in our ISKCON society today, from his
own personal understanding, and his realizations of the instructions
given by Srila Prabhupada shortly before his untimely departure. Our
obeisances to him for sharing his personal recollections and
realizations. This new The Spiritual Master (Part 4) is exploring the
same theme although from a different source.
The Spiritual Master (Part 4)
by Sriman Locanananda Prabhu
"Whatever I have to speak, I have spoken in my books."
Because
the implementation of an initiation system is basically a function of
management, the question becomes whether Srila Prabhupada gave
managerial instructions in his books to guide ISKCON in this regard? If
so, we should have been able to find all of the information necessary to
set up the required initiation protocols by researching them in his
books. The fact is that throughout his books there is not even one
mention of the GBC, ISKCON's topmost rung on the ladder of management,
what to speak of Srila Prabhupada's management instructions given to
ISKCON's GBC on the subject of conducting future initiations.
Because
Srila Prabhupada was an expert manager and always did everything
possible to protect ISKCON and his young disciples, he must have guided
the society through channels other than through his books. Those would
include his letters to devotees and his room conversations, particular
with ISKCON leaders, like the one that took place on May 28, 1977.
It
is said that if we receive instructions that are difficult for us to
reconcile, our duty is to follow the most recent instruction. The reason
why the ritvik explanation is imperfect is because it places the
greatest emphasis on the July 9th letter, which was issued in pursuance
of the May 28 conversation.
In other words, it was the more recent order and, in the mind of the ritvik ideologist, the final order on initiations.
To
understand these references clearly and to be able to see the July 9,
1977 letter in proper perspective, one must first grasp how the May 28th
conversation reveals the two phases of initiation protocols Srila
Prabhupada was introducing: 1) initiations that would be performed
during the remainder of his lifetime and 2) initiations that would be
performed when he would no longer be with us visibly. The July 9th
letter is in pursuance of the May 28th conversation insofar as it names
those disciples who were going to act on Srila Prabhupada's behalf to
conduct initiations during the two phases under discussion. The other
protocols that are mentioned in the letter refer to that time when Srila
Prabhupada was still with us (1). So when the letter states that those
initiated would be Srila Prabhupada's direct disciples, it is referring
to those initiated during Srila Prabhupada's lifetime. According to the
May 28 meeting with the GBC, those initiated during phase two by
officiating acaryas would be Srila Prabhupada's grand disciples.
The
term "officiating acarya" was coined by Srila Prabhupada and first
introduced in ISKCON during the May 28th conversation. He was being
asked particularly about initiations that would be conducted when he
would no longer be present, and he replied, "I will recommend some of
you to act as officiating acaryas." Where, then, are ISKCON's
officiating acaryas? In thirty-five years since this conversation took
place, no GBC resolution has ever mentioned "officiating acaryas," nor
has a single initiator of disciples in ISKCON ever referred to himself
as such. When will a meeting finally take place with the purpose of
discussing the role of the officiating acarya as the giver of diksa in
Srila Prabhupada's absence?
We can be sure that Srila Prabhupada
was well aware of the conflict of authority that was bound to take place
in ISKCON if initiators were thinking of themselves as the ultimate
spiritual authority in the lives of their disciples. He meant to curb
the tendency in his leading disciples of wanting to control everything
by adding the limitation of "officiating" to the term acarya, but that
was rejected. Instead, we have had scores of "diksa gurus" and
"initiating spiritual masters" who were supposed to be pure devotees
making disciples all of the world (Nectar of Instruction, 1). Whether it
is because they accepted the karma of too many disciples or became
carried away with the worship and praise of their underlings, ISKCON's
leaders obviously have been unable to come up with a system of
initiation suitable for a worldwide movement through the process of
experimentation and based upon their independent research of Srila
Prabhupada's books.
Perhaps the time has come for everyone to
give Srila Prabhupada's recommendation a chance to succeed. Without
doing so, our ISKCON society will continue to be hampered by two
non-parallel lines of authority that are in conflict with each other
more often than not. This arrogant dismissal of Srila Prabhupada's
recommendation to have officiating acaryas perform initiations has been a
great hindrance in the spreading of Krishna consciousness and to the
unity of ISKCON. How much longer must the world wait for us to give up
our prideful independence and disinclination to act according to the
will of the spiritual master?
Text pasted from the series
diksa or ritvik